Thursday, September 17, 2026

Three Boys, No Screens, and the Weekends We're Turning Into Memories

(9 mins read)


I told my three sons we were going on a treasure hunt. What I did not tell them was that there was no treasure. I had not hidden anything; I had not prepared any clues, and honestly, I did not even have a plan. I simply had three energetic boys, aged eight, four, and two and a half, running around the house, and I needed to give all that energy somewhere to go. So, with three curious faces looking at me, I made up a rule on the spot: we had to find trees with fruit on them, and the fruit had to be visible from where we were standing. No climbing, no guessing, no touching the fruit. Just looking. That was it. We stepped outside without knowing where we were going or what we would find, and somehow that made the walk more interesting. We found a banana tree, a small pomegranate tree and an imli tree, which my eldest announced with the excitement of someone who had discovered something extraordinary. We also found a neem tree, but the fruit was so tiny that it led to a serious discussion about whether it should count as treasure, and the boys eventually decided that it did not. The rules, although invented only minutes earlier, were being followed with surprising seriousness.

As we continued walking, I started thinking about how easily we miss things that are right in front of us. I have probably walked past those same trees dozens of times without stopping to ask what they were, whether they had fruit, or what season they were in. The boys had turned an ordinary walk into a little expedition simply because I had given them a reason to look. It made me wonder how much of life works the same way. Sometimes the world does not necessarily become more interesting; we simply become more attentive to it. A tree that was always there suddenly becomes a discovery, an old building becomes a mystery, and a signboard becomes a puzzle. Perhaps this is one of the beautiful things about childhood: children have not yet become as good as we adults are at filtering the world out. Everything can still be worth noticing. And as a father, I sometimes feel that I am not really trying to teach my children something new; I am trying to make sure they do not lose the ability to notice the things that are already there.

Looking at the world differently

The following weekend, I changed the treasure hunt. This time, I told them to find a big letter W somewhere in the neighbourhood, something they could see from a distance. We walked around looking at signboards, buildings, shops and anything else that might contain the letter. My eight-year-old spotted a W on a billboard quite quickly, but then he found another one hidden among a complicated mess of cables between two poles, and somehow that one became more exciting than the billboard. For the next hour, they kept looking up and pointing things out to each other. Somewhere along the way, I realised that none of them had asked for my phone. That small observation stayed with me. We often talk about children being distracted by screens, but perhaps sometimes the answer is not simply to take something away. Maybe we also need to give them something worth looking at. A little curiosity can compete with a screen in ways that another lecture about screen time cannot. The neighbourhood suddenly had signs, trees, animals, buildings, letters and stories hidden everywhere, and all I had done was ask a different question.

It also reminded me of something I often think about when I look at my children. Allah swt has given children such a natural ability to be amazed by small things. A bird sitting on a wire can hold their attention longer than an expensive toy. A puddle can become an entire afternoon's entertainment. A small insect can bring everyone to a complete standstill. As adults, we slowly become efficient at ignoring these things because we have meetings, deadlines, bills, responsibilities, and a hundred other thoughts occupying our minds. Perhaps one of the gifts children give us is the opportunity to slow down and see the world through their eyes again. They make us notice things we had stopped noticing. And sometimes, while thinking that we are taking them out to experience something, we realise that they are the ones teaching us to experience it.

The turf, the park and the road

On weekends when I play football on a turf near home, I usually take my two older boys with me. They do not really play; they sit at the edge and watch, and during the breaks they jump onto the turf and run around in circles for absolutely no reason. There is something wonderfully innocent about watching children run simply because they can. We also try to visit a park every weekend, and I have made it a small habit not to keep going to the same one. Over time, we have visited quite a few parks around Hyderabad, and we do something similar whenever we are in Kolkata. My wife takes our youngest to the park almost every day because the older two have evening classes and often miss the weekday trips. I sometimes think about that little difference between the three of them, about how parenting three children at different ages means that fairness does not always look like giving everyone exactly the same thing. Sometimes one gets the weekday park, another gets the football turf, and another gets an extra story before bed. You keep adjusting, trying to give each child what they need at that particular stage of their life.

On one of our Sunday cycle rides, we started counting every dog and cat we saw. There was no prize and no real purpose to the exercise, but the tally became very serious. Every few minutes someone would shout that they had spotted another dog or cat, and the count would start again if someone disagreed. On our walks, we have also started noticing abandoned buildings and half-finished houses, the kind with staircases leading to nowhere and grass growing through the unfinished floors. I sometimes make up stories about them and tell the boys that perhaps a family was supposed to live there, or perhaps the owner moved away, or maybe the construction stopped because something happened. None of it is necessarily true, and they know that I am making up some of it, but they still ask questions and add their own ideas. For a few minutes, an abandoned building becomes a story rather than just another building we walk past. I think there is something valuable in that kind of imagination, because not everything in childhood needs to have a learning objective attached to it. Sometimes it is enough for a child to wonder.

It isn't always picture-perfect

Of course, this kind of childhood adventure does not always go according to plan. On one of our walks, a stray dog started barking aggressively at my middle son, and I had to move quickly and get between them. For those few moments, my heart was somewhere near my throat. It was a good reminder that the world outside our homes is real, and real means that there are risks too. There are dogs, traffic, uneven roads, open spaces and half-built buildings, and as parents we cannot simply ignore those things in the name of giving children freedom. I am not trying to romanticise danger, and I certainly do not want my children to learn about risk the hard way. But I have started wondering whether there is a difference between keeping children safe and trying to make childhood completely predictable. We can protect them without arranging every minute of their lives. We can teach them to be careful without making the entire world feel frightening. There is a certain kind of learning that happens only when a child is allowed to look, explore, ask questions, and occasionally encounter something they did not expect. Perhaps the goal is not to remove every risk, but to help them slowly learn how to recognise and navigate it. That feels much closer to preparing them for life than simply keeping everything around them controlled.

What am I really trying to give them?

None of these afternoons will appear on a school report card. Finding a pomegranate tree will not make my son better at mathematics, and counting dogs and cats will not earn him a certificate. But I think something else is happening, something that is much harder to measure. They are learning to look up, to pay attention, to notice a tree they may have walked past many times, to wonder why a building was abandoned, and to turn an ordinary walk into something memorable. I am not doing these things because I want my children to become experts at identifying trees or letters on billboards. I think I am trying to give them something much simpler: a childhood with enough small moments that they will have something to remember. We spend so much of our time as parents trying to give our children the best education, the right activities, good food, good clothes, good schools, and every opportunity we can afford. All of that matters, but sometimes I wonder whether we underestimate the value of ordinary time spent together. A walk with no destination, a silly game made up on the spot, a conversation about a stray dog or an abandoned house - these things cost almost nothing, but they may quietly become some of the memories that stay with us. And perhaps this is also a form of shukr, of gratitude, because when we slow down enough to notice the ordinary blessings around us, we begin to realise how much has already been given to us.

I imagine my sons twenty/thirty years from now, when they have families of their own and their childhood is something they can only reach through memories. I know they will not remember everything we did, and they certainly will not remember most of the things I spent so much time worrying about as a father. They may not remember the exact parks we visited, the football turfs we went to, or how many times I told them to keep their shoes outside the house. But I hope they remember the feeling of those afternoons. I hope one of them remembers a father who occasionally said, “Come, let's go,” without having a very good reason. I hope he remembers walking through the neighbourhood looking for fruit on trees, the excitement of finding an imli tree, and the serious argument over whether a tiny neem fruit was good enough to qualify as treasure. I hope he remembers that sometimes we went outside simply to see what we could find. And perhaps one day, when he has children of his own, he might take them out for a walk and invent a little game of his own, without worrying too much about whether it is educational or productive or Instagram-worthy. Maybe that is when I will know that these small moments mattered.

There was no treasure that day. I had promised my sons a treasure hunt without actually having any treasure to give them. But we found a banana tree, a pomegranate tree and an imli tree. We found a neem tree that failed the test. We found laughter, arguments, stories, and a few hours where three boys were simply outside, looking at the world around them. And the more I think about it, the more I feel that perhaps the treasure was never something I was supposed to hide for them to find. Perhaps it was already there - in the trees Allah swt had planted, in the streets we had walked past without noticing, in their laughter, and in the simple privilege of having these three little boys call me “Abbu” and ask me to come along. Maybe that is what childhood teaches us, if we are paying attention: that some of the most valuable things in life are not the things we plan, buy, or achieve. They are the ordinary moments we almost miss, until one day we look back and realise they were never ordinary at all.


Wednesday, September 9, 2026

Why Your Brain Doesn't Care If You Read or Listen (But You Might Be Losing an Old Skill)

(3 mins read)


Sometimes I finish a chapter and can't tell you what happened on the page before it. Not every time, just often enough to notice. For years I quietly blamed myself for it, thought it meant my attention was slipping or my memory wasn't what it used to be. Turns out it's probably not about the book at all. It's about how much attention I actually bring to it, whether I'm reading or listening. Most people don't put it that way though. They blame the medium, and audiobooks usually take the hit.

The New Guilt: Is Listening "Real" Reading?

Ask any book club, and someone will confess it, usually with a little shame. "I listened to it, does that count?" There's a quiet assumption that audiobooks are the lazy cousin of real reading, fine for commutes, not fine for anything that matters.

The research says otherwise, at least for a big chunk of what we read.

What the Brain Actually Does

In 2019, researchers at UC Berkeley scanned people's brains while they read and listened to the same stories. They built detailed maps of which brain regions lit up for which meanings. The surprise: the maps for reading and listening were almost identical. Your brain doesn't file "meaning" differently depending on whether it came through your eyes or your ears.

That holds well for narrative, stories, memoirs, anything with a flow. It holds less well for dense, information-heavy material like textbooks. Print still wins there, and for a simple reason: your eyes can flip back, your fingers can mark a spot, and the page itself gives you a spatial cue, top left, third paragraph - that your ear never gets. Reading also seems to leave less room for your mind to wander off.

One more myth worth killing: reading and listening to the same book at once doesn't make you learn it better. The combined effect is barely there. What actually matters, far more than the medium, is attention. A fully focused audiobook beats a distracted page every time, and a focused page beats a half-listened podcast.

Here's Where I Think We're Fooling Ourselves

That "I can't hold an idea from chapter one by the time I reach chapter five" feeling gets treated like a fixed limit of the human brain. I don't think it is. I think it's a learned dependency, and printing is what taught it to us.

Go back far enough, and you find people who memorized entire texts, not chapters, entire books, word for word, and carried them for a lifetime. Oral traditions across cultures did this as a matter of course. Reciters held whole epics in their heads. In the Islamic tradition, memorizing the entire Quran, well over six thousand verses, is still common practice today, done by ordinary children, not savants.

Blind readers make the same point in a smaller, everyday way. Without the option to flip back and skim, they lean harder on tracking meaning as it comes, and they manage just fine. The mental storehouse is still there. It just doesn't get exercised much in sighted readers, because the page is always right there to check.

Cheap, easy access to printed books did for memory what GPS did for a sense of direction. We didn't lose the ability. We just stopped needing it, so it went quiet.

So What Should You Actually Do With This

Don't feel guilty about audiobooks. Match the medium to the material: fiction, memoir, and narrative nonfiction work beautifully as audio, especially with full attention. Dense or technical material still benefits from print's ability to be reread and marked up.

And maybe, once in a while, try the harder thing on purpose. Before you check your notes or flip back a page, try to recall the last chapter from memory alone. It won't come easily at first. That's the muscle waking back up.

The real skill was never in the ink or the sound waves. It was always in the attention you brought to either one. Audiobooks didn't make us forgetful. Cheap printing just let a much older muscle go quiet.


Sources

Monday, August 24, 2026

Why Does Time Feel Like It's Running Out? 7 Ways to Bring Barakah Back

 (2 mins read)


Wasn't it just Sunday? You blink, and the weekend's back again, barely enough time to catch your breath in between. If that feeling has been nagging at you lately, you're not imagining it, and, interestingly, it's not just a modern complaint either.

I recently watched a video by Dr. Omar Suleiman on the concept of barakah - divine blessing - in time and life, and it reframed something I'd been feeling but couldn't quite name.

It's Not Just You. Time Really Is Shrinking.

There's a well-known prophecy from the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) that says the "Hour" won't come until time itself is compressed: a year passing like a month, a month like a week, a week like a day. Not the clock speeding up, but the blessing draining out of it. Days stay 24 hours long, but they stop feeling like enough.

And if you look at how most of us actually spend our time today, it's not hard to see why. We're distracted before we've even started the day. We chase a hundred shallow interactions instead of a few meaningful ones. We stay up late for no real reason and wake up already behind. None of that is a coincidence; it's the natural result of how we're choosing to live, layered on top of something the Prophet  described centuries ago.

The good news is that Dr. Suleiman's video doesn't stop at the diagnosis. It offers a practical way back: seven habits from the Sunnah that don't just fill up your day, but actually put the blessing back into it.



The Real Takeaway

None of these seven habits are complicated, and that's kind of the point. Getting more barakah isn't about finding more hours in the day; it's about how deliberately you use the ones you already have.

I'll admit, reading through this list felt less like learning something new and more like being reminded of something I already knew and had quietly let slide. Maybe that's true for you too. The Prophet  described the shrinking as a sign of the times, but he also left us a way to push back against it, one habit at a time.


Saturday, August 22, 2026

The Machine That's Mining Your Attention

 (4 mins read)



You close your laptop after a long meeting. Or you shut your notebook after a study session. And within ten seconds, your thumb is already unlocking the phone. No decision was made. No thought crossed your mind. It just... happened.

If that sounds familiar, you're not weak-willed. You're not "bad at discipline." You're reacting exactly the way a very well-designed machine wants you to react.

That's the idea that stopped me mid-scroll this week, from a video by Dr. FrancescaBocca-Aldaqre, an Islamic psychologist who studies exactly this intersection: the mind, the soul, and the systems built to hijack both. Her point isn't the usual "social media is haram" lecture. It's something sharper: it doesn't matter whether the content you're consuming is halal, wholesome, or even religious. The platform itself is built to manipulate you, regardless of what's on the screen.

The problem isn't the content. It's the machine.

Here's the uncomfortable comparison she draws: your favorite app works like a slot machine. Not by accident but by design. Teams of psychologists and neuroscientists are paid, specifically, to figure out how to keep your thumb moving. Every autoplay, every notification ping, every "just one more" scroll is a small, deliberate pull on a lever built to exploit how your brain's reward system works.

In Islamic terms, what's being exploited is called hawā - the raw, impulsive desire in you that wants the next hit of stimulation before you've even finished processing the last one. The machine doesn't create hawā. It just knows exactly how to keep feeding it, faster than your awareness can catch up.

And here's the part that actually lands: you can be a good, practicing Muslim: five prayers a day, fasting, the whole routine, and still lose this fight. Dr. Francesca describes the result as being "religiously practicing but spiritually starving." Because the war isn't over whether you pray. It's over what happens to your attention in the hours between prayers. Islam calls that state of drift ghafla - heedlessness. Not disbelief. Not sin, exactly. Just a slow, quiet numbness where your attention is always somewhere else, mined by something else, and Allah barely gets a passing thought.

You can't out-willpower a machine. You need a counter-machine.

This is the part I appreciated most; she doesn't say "delete the apps" and leave you there. Willpower alone doesn't beat a system built by behavioral scientists. What beats a machine is a better machine. And the Sunnah, it turns out, already comes with the architecture for one. Three pieces of it stood out:

1. Guard the two doors of your day. Before the screen gets your first and last thought of the day, morning and evening adhkar get it instead. Whoever owns your first ten minutes and your last ten minutes owns a lot more of your day than you'd think.

2. Take back one gap. Somewhere in your day, there's a stretch of dead time: a commute, a queue, a few minutes waiting for something to load. The instinct is to fill it with scrolling. Protect just one of these gaps instead. Let it stay empty, or fill it with reflection. Silence isn't wasted time. It's often the only unclaimed territory left in a fully monetized day.

3. Let prayers interrupt you. Five times a day, something physically pulls you away from the feed, whether you like it or not. Instead of resenting the interruption, use it as exactly that: a forced, physical exit from the digital stream, on a schedule the algorithm can't override.

None of these three require you to become a monk or throw your phone in a river. They just insert small, non-negotiable checkpoints into a day that would otherwise be one long, uninterrupted scroll.

The freedom underneath all this

Dr. Francesca closes on a verse from Surah Al-Furqan (25:43), where the Quran describes a person who has effectively made their own desire into a god they obey without question. It's a strange thing to read a fourteen-century-old verse and feel like it's describing an app.

But that's the point. The tech didn't invent this weakness in us. It just found the most efficient way yet to profit from it. Real freedom, in her framing, isn't logging off in frustration. It's replacing the automatic reach for the phone with something that actually feeds you - dhikr, remembrance, a few seconds of attention pointed somewhere that isn't selling you anything.

The machine is going to keep pulling. The only question worth asking is what you've built to pull back.


Inspired by "Social Media Is Changing Your Heart | Even If You Follow Halal Content | Dr. Francesca"

Saturday, August 15, 2026

The Architecture of Showing Off vs. the Architecture of Shelter

(2 mins read)


There's a rule most of us grew up with: leave your shoes at the door. It felt like manners. Turns out it's something older - a small daily ritual that tells your body: this space is different, this space is protected.

I picked this up while watching a fascinating conversation with Dr. Abdel-Wahed El-Wakil, the Egyptian architect who rebuilt Masjid Quba and Masjid Qiblatain in Medina. He talks about the sacred in architecture - how a home's courtyard was traditionally treated as a sanctuary. Taking your shoes off wasn't hygiene. It was a boundary. You left the street outside, dust and noise and all, and stepped into somewhere calmer.

That idea - architecture as sanctuary, not just shelter - runs through the whole conversation, and it made me think about how differently we build now.

Walk into an old haveli, a Cairo courtyard house, or a traditional Indian home, and you'll notice something: thick walls, small windows facing away from the sun, a central open courtyard, air moving through without a single fan. These weren't decorative choices. They were climate engineering, centuries before the word existed. The courtyard pulled hot air up and out. Thick mud or stone walls held the coolness of the night deep into the afternoon. The building worked with the climate instead of against it.

Compare that to a modern glass tower. Glass looks impressive - sleek, expensive, modern. But glass has one job in a hot climate: it traps heat and passes it straight through. A glass building in Hyderabad in May isn't cooled by design; it's cooled by brute-force air conditioning, running nonstop, burning power to undo what the building itself is doing wrong. El-Wakil makes a sharp point here: glass and steel towers aren't chosen because they function well in our climates. They're chosen because they signal status. We're building monuments to appearance, not shelter.

He goes further, and this is the part that stuck with me: he believes our education systems have quietly taught us an inferiority complex about our own traditions. We're trained to see mud-brick and courtyards as "backward" and glass-and-concrete as "progress" - even when the old methods were smarter for the place they were built in. His own mentor, Hassan Fathy, spent a lifetime proving that mud-brick, built right, beats concrete on comfort, cost, and dignity.

None of this is really nostalgia. It's a question worth sitting with: how much of what we call "modern" is actually just expensive, and how much of what we call "old-fashioned" was just smart engineering wearing a humble material?

Next time you take your shoes off at someone's door, you might notice it's doing more than you thought.